Serenity, Such Serenity
At one point someone said (approximately): I'm just relieved to see that Augustine doesn't forsake the worldy pleasures, that he doesn't scorn the world.
What? There are innumerable passages to the contrary. I pointed them out and asked what they thought about this or that explicit rejection of the world and its pleasures. (I did not say that he hated the world, or that he failed to see the good of its beauty and its pleasures.) I also said that he was naturally virtuous.
To the former their response was that those were merely Augustine's own personal shortcomings, that he only prefers to stay away from food and women and music because they have such an affect on him. The latter caused an uproar. Citing Augustine's own words, they made him out to be this horrible sinner.
But isn't it clear that his exceeding holiness made what most people wouldn't even notice as slight, in his conscience, a horrible sin? That if Augustine is grossly gluttonous then I'm hardly human? If he suffers from lust then half the world is damned on that account? Seriously, Augustine talks about stealing a pear as a signal sin in him. Isn't it clear that his life-long struggle to find truth, to determine his end are far beyond ordinary?
The point is, what does one do when someone doesn't see the obvious (as a matter of experience or wisdom or something)? Here's a better example. I remember in 12th grade making as a passing comment that it takes courage to commit suicide. My class laughed at what they thought to be a ridiculous idea, saying that suicide is the ultimate cowardly act. Well, yeah, it is, except it still takes courage to do it. This I only knew from experience; I read in a novel about a character too scared to commit suicide; I saw in a movie someone too scared to make the leap. So how does one communicate this knowledge?
Jene gave a reassuring argument. Man naturally dislikes pain. Man naturally dislikes death. Therefore, etc. But what when there is no easy argument?


